Oldskool 6,644 #101 Posted September 17, 2022 Maybe a body kinda like this? 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Oldskool 6,644 #102 Posted September 17, 2022 Well, things took another turn 🤔. For the better? For worse? I'm not sure. It does look like it may have room for 2 engines after all. 2 6 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ebinmaine 67,593 #103 Posted September 17, 2022 Aye!! Now that's some right proper mad scientist work!! 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sjoemie himself 3,068 #104 Posted September 18, 2022 I knew it! Found ya on Facebook @Oldskool Looking good. If you put two engines in there you'll sure have something unique and faaaaast. 1 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pullstart 62,905 #105 Posted September 22, 2022 On 9/18/2022 at 2:47 PM, sjoemie himself said: If you put two engines in there you'll sure have something unique and faaaaast. Would that make it any faster, or just tougher? Still limited at 3600 rpms, right? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sjoemie himself 3,068 #106 Posted September 22, 2022 Yes, you would have to change the gearing. Standard gear ratio would be same speed but with more torque. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Oldskool 6,644 #107 Posted September 22, 2022 I'm thinking I'll probably go with a bit smaller trans pulley. Not enough to make low range as fast as hi range would be stock. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Handy Don 12,235 #108 Posted September 22, 2022 If you slave both engines to a shared jackshaft, you could enlarge the jackshaft's pulley to the trans as well. 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites