Jump to content
meadowfield

GT14 transmissions

Recommended Posts

meadowfield

I've been a little slow, and not paid attention - my first GT-14 1-0502 - serial 907068 has the following transmission - which we pulled apart 8-9 years ago.

 

Ports on the side and tow valve to the front - which locks tight.

 

image.png.9c3aa37c6747f25926890be27805ccf4.png

 

My second GT14, which doesn't run, 1-0502 is serial 907028 has the following transmission.

 

Ports on the top and a tow valve that spins, but locks in one direction.

 

image.png.60f038088785c8133315254ad2688b85.png

 

Both were manufactured probably in the same week in the same factory. I doubt they made them with different transmission - so which is original to the year?

 

Assume one has been replaced?

 

Any GT14 experts shed any light on this? 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
953 nut

The second one looks like the hydrogear on my 1970 GT-14

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
19richie66

Mine is a 72 and it had the transmission with the valve and fittings on top. Can’t help you with the serial number as mine had one that was unreadable. It is a 1-0502 model though. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
pfrederi

Top one is a piston to piston hydro transmission  not correct for a GT-14.  Some one must have changed the input gear to make it work with a GT-14 transaxle unless they swapped out the whole rear end.  Piston to piston units first appeared in the 18 Autos and some no-names.  Then used in C series after that.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
meadowfield
48 minutes ago, pfrederi said:

Top one is a piston to piston hydro transmission  not correct for a GT-14.  Some one must have changed the input gear to make it work with a GT-14 transaxle unless they swapped out the whole rear end.  Piston to piston units first appeared in the 18 Autos and some no-names.  Then used in C series after that.

 

I'm sure when I bought it, I had a manual that showed GT-14 with piston/piston. Also I thought later ones had it fitted - but i can't find anything. Whoever swapped it (I'm in the UK) did a good job if they did!

 

I've mentioned it loads of times ands no one ever corrected me - Help :)  am I going mad or did they fit both???

Edited by meadowfield
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
pfrederi

The first hydro were Wheel-a-matics.  Basically a Sunstrand hydro gear early version.  The service manual for it was pretty thin.  other than a couple of minor adjustments it was repair by replacement.  Next generation was the hydro gear used  in GT-14s, Chargers Broncos.  The service manual had a few more fixes but it was still pretty heavily repair by replacement.  I believe there is a TSB somewhere that talks about using Piston to piston to replace bad hydro gear units.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
meadowfield
1 hour ago, pfrederi said:

The first hydro were Wheel-a-matics.  Basically a Sunstrand hydro gear early version.  The service manual for it was pretty thin.  other than a couple of minor adjustments it was repair by replacement.  Next generation was the hydro gear used  in GT-14s, Chargers Broncos.  The service manual had a few more fixes but it was still pretty heavily repair by replacement.  I believe there is a TSB somewhere that talks about using Piston to piston to replace bad hydro gear units.


thanks, so where did I get the idea from that it changed over during GT-14 production?  I must have dreamt it. Odd that no one flagged the pics of mine when I was plumbing the lift cylinder in.

That also might explain why there was no hydraulics... I had to take bolts out of the charge pump in order to pipe it! 
Hoping Garry chimes in and tells me I didn’t dream it all up...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
gwest_ca
1 hour ago, meadowfield said:

Hoping Garry chimes in and tells me I didn’t dream it all up...

Sorry not able to do that.

 

I have never understood the model numbering system that they used. The 90-2062 Sundstrand is shown for every GT-14 model.

Tried to record their use thinking the number represented the hydro and final drive combination but that turned out to be not true unless they recorded the models incorrectly.

 

Garry

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
pfrederi

Looking at the manuals section here for GT-14 even the last year of production used 90-2062  same as first year of production  like mine

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
953 nut
5 minutes ago, gwest_ca said:

Sorry not able to do that.

 

I have never understood the model numbering system that they used. The 90-2062 Sundstrand is shown for every GT-14 model.

Tried to record their use thinking the number represented the hydro and final drive combination but that turned out to be not true unless they recorded the models incorrectly.

 

Garry

I think you are correct Garry. The output gear of the 90-2062 from the Hydrogear to the transaxle is different  than the ones on Charger/Electro units. I did a thread about seven years ago on changing the gear out. Everything else on the two Sundstrand units was the same. I don't remember the number of teeth each one has. 

post-8798-0-11813200-1368299879_thumb.jp

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
daveoman1966

The Sundstrand Hydrogear model for the GT-14 is 90-2062 and the 'drive gear' is 11-tooth.  

On the Sundstrand Hydrogear  models 90-2046, that same gear is only 13-tooth.

Here are the comparisons...

90-2062 (53).jpg

90-2062--10.jpg

  • Excellent 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
meadowfield

thanks guys, no worries Garry...

 

given I pulled it all apart and put it together and never noticed any anomalies, I'm assuming the swap was done by a dealer or someone very competent!

 

:D

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
meadowfield

whilst we are on the topic...  a friend has another one of the rare GT14's here in the UK and it sounds like the differential has failed. Possibly the splines on the pinions - assume it is a 10 pinion from the era? but with longer axles?  I never split the diff on mine to look... 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...