Pullstart 62,782 #1 Posted September 17, 2015 So I'm working on hooking up a "late model" tiller to my 502. Based on drive pulley difference of my 502 (now 8 hp / 8 speed) and my 8 speed donor c-101, I've come up with this data:rear tiller pulley is 9.5"another pulley I have is 6.5"pi * 9.5 = 29.83pi * 6.5 = 20.41difference of 68.4% circumference roughlydrive pulley of c-101 is 4.5"drive pulley of 502 is 2.5"using the same formulas, difference of 55.5% circumference roughlywith that 6.5" pulley mounted on the tiller, I'd be at about 80% of stock drive speed. is that correct? if so, I should be able to perform alright if I drop down a gear. Without changing any pulleys, I figure I'm about 55% of drive speed.I just don't want to buy a belt just to be unsatisfied with the performance of the larger pulley. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gwest_ca-(File Mod) 11,031 #2 Posted September 17, 2015 I take it you are just working on the tiller tine speed.What about your ground speed? The 502 is too fast at the rpm required to drive the tiller. Even 1st gear at an idle is too fast. A low range 6-speed transmission or a speed reduction kit may be in order.http://www.wheelhorseforum.com/files/file/499-speed-reducer-1964-1966-sr-64-om-ipl-a-7140pdf/Garry Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
stevasaurus 22,705 #3 Posted September 17, 2015 Garry, I think his math is correct, and it sounds like he has an 8 speed tranny with an 8 hsp (from a C-101) on the 502 frame. He said he had a late model tiller...so with the new trans and the new engine...he really should not have to change anything. The only difference is the frame and wheel base. My only question...wouldn't a C-101 have a 10 hsp Kohler?? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pullstart 62,782 #4 Posted September 17, 2015 thanks for the input guys, I appreciate anything I can get! I did toss in an 8 speed so with low range, I have a feeling I'll be plenty slow to let the tiller dig - as long as I have the tiller speed turning. the engine is a K181T from a belt driven air compressor so I think power shouldn't be an issue with the crawl ratio of low range. so it'll still spin slower than if it were on the c-101, but if math is correct I guess it'll do. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
slammer302 2,155 #5 Posted September 17, 2015 I think the 8hp will do just fine if you take it slow I have a friend with a B-80 with tiller and he gets the job done Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pullstart 62,782 #6 Posted September 17, 2015 cool, thanks Slammer Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gwest_ca-(File Mod) 11,031 #7 Posted September 17, 2015 (edited) 4.5" engine pulley divided by 9.5" tiller pulley = 47.37%2.5" engine pulley divided by 5.278" tiller pulley = 47.37%I use a Roper tiller that has it's own 8hp engine with a 3" pulley and a 6" on the tiller. They went with a pair of belts I suspect because of the short contact area on a 3" pulley.Garry Edited September 18, 2015 by gwest_ca Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tim.bergfeld 0 #8 Posted September 17, 2015 Wow I have a pulley questions too don't wanna high jack your thread Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pullstart 62,782 #9 Posted September 18, 2015 well my 6.5" pulley was the wrong size so I have a new one on the way from ebay... then measuring for a belt and getting tension all set! look out garden, red's coming. I guess I'll have to get some time to get a few truckloads of manure this fall! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites