Jump to content
trettig

RJ 35 1955 (how can you tell)

Recommended Posts

trettig

How can you tell the difference between a 1955 RJ and a 1956 RJ, 1957 RJ?

Tom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
trettig

Also how rare is the RJ 1955, 1956 and 1957? How many are out there?

Tom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
grnlark

55's and 56's did not have any name on the front of the hood. 57 did.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
VinsRJ

RJ35s are fairly rare, they do come up for sale from time to time though. Nice restored examples and easily restorable examples sell QUICK and usually for good money.

Let me put it this way Tom, you've seen my RJs..... if I had to, I'd sell all of them except my RJ35. :ychain:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
trettig

Thanks for the info.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Redbirdman

'Straight from the Horses Mouth' said the '55 has no logo and the name Pond on the trans cover.

Whereas the '57 has the logo and no Pond name.

But the '56 could have either or both.........

In fact in "Straight from The Horses Mouth" (endorsed by Cecil Pond), they state the embossed hood was 'introduced for 1956. And no significant changes were made for 1957.'

They also state the first 100 produced in 1955 not only had fiberglas hoods, but cable and spool steering and aluminum steering wheels (later changed to white metal).............now that would be a find!

Of course 58 is a whole new game with the angle iron chassis etc etc......

Anybody?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
TT

I'd like to voice my opinion on two things in this topic............ :D

First - the author of "the book" is a member here, so I will be as kind as possible. (nothing personal, Mike) Although a lot of the information was sourced from the son of the man behind :D , some things contained between the covers of "the book" appear to have come from the other end of the horse. :hide:

The more time you spend around these creatures, the more little changes and differences will be seen. Yes - they are a lot better than some other brands, but there are some things that aren't written in stone. Mid-production revisions, substitutions, and perhaps even an "oops" or two never made it past the factory walls - on paper, that is.

Until thousands of owners and collectors started congregating in large numbers, the ability to compare and actually notice the differences and the "gray areas" wasn't there.

Second - I am not ashamed to admit that the RJ-35 models are not one of my strong points. What I do know (for sure) is that were built in 1955, 1956, & 1957. :D

The Ponds were trying to get them perfected during that entire time. They were also dealing with registering trademarks, applying for patents, setting up dealerships, establishing reliable suppliers, looking for the best deals on components, designing the Uni-Drive transaxle, etc.

I honestly don't think they can successfully be divided in to three (fool-proof) individual years of production. I prefer to think of the RJ-35 as one three-year production run with many changes. I realize that sales receipts and dealer records could narrow it down, along with some of the unique traits. (such as the gas tank stand, cable steering, etc.) But - over 50 years later, how can a steering wheel, belt guard, hood, or any other removable part be guaranteed to be the part that was on the tractor when it was new? People didn't buy these tractors to keep them original and perfect - they bought them with hard-earned money and they used them. They kept them running and usable however they could. Even some of the OEM replacement/service parts were totally different than the originals.

Yes, Tim LaPree published his thoughts and interpretations on the RJ-25/35 models, but that was a long time ago. (internet-wise) The basics were somewhat easy to figure out, but even he admitted to not being sure on some of the stuff. If everyone who has an RJ-35 would compare notes now, the three-year blur might become a little more clear, but year-to-year smudges will always be there.

My RJ-35 is in many pieces upstairs in my shop. I honestly don't care exactly when it was built - but I know it's an RJ-35 and that's all that matters to me. :ychain:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
rj35hunter

TT, you couldn't have said it any better. I have been trying very hard to determine the differences in the three years of RJ35 production and it's by far the hardest thing I've ever done. I have 8 RJ35 tractors and they are all 8 different. Even though I can determine some of their years easily, the others are kinda shady and I don't think anyone can say for sure! You can see some of their variations change and improve over time, but that is only a guide to help decide the year. I have learned this is what makes this hobby interesting and very challenging!

Clay

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Redbirdman

So then: we have established that the cable steer does exist and is probably one of the first 100 produced? Or not? Perhaps the replaced cables were tossed in a box and later used to refurbish a hulk? And the hood is not any indicator since it would be interchangeable in all three years? (as with the Pond Logo)...

And that Straight from the Horses Mouth is only 50 percent reliable (but Mr. Martino is still a good guy?)

Other than that, everything else is ok :ychain:

hmmmmmmmmmmm I like this place, my kinda people! :D :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
grnlark

... Whereas the '57 has the logo and no Pond name.

I'll have to disagree with this statement, as my '57 has the name on the hood, and does say Pond on the trans case.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
VinsRJ

The reason I didn't chime in on this thread as hard as others have is this is like the "value" question. There is no real straight answer........

Like TT and RJ35Hunter said, pretty much no two are alike. They were built in a garage with whatever parts were on hand at that time or even that day. There are countless documented examples where 55 parts are found on a 56s and 56 parts are found on a 57s. Deciding the year of production is measured with your thumb not a micrometer. You have to take in account the entire tractor...... hood, seat, rear hitch, frame, even the steering shaft can tell you whether it was an iron wheel unit or not..... and then you need to account for the passage of time...... repairs, part swaps and abuse..... all prior to narrowing down the year. :ychain:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
CasualObserver

So then: we have established that the cable steer does exist

"We" didn't have any doubt. :ychain:

There was one or two sold on ebay a while ago. (or not sold and a private deal made... )I don't remember which. There's probably pictures here somewhere... or at the very least a couple threads about it.

Here's a few.

http://www.wheelhorseforum.com/index.php?showtopic=8553

http://www.wheelhorseforum.com/index.php?showtopic=13085

http://www.wheelhorseforum.com/index.php?showtopic=16779

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
The Freightliner Guy
Posted (edited)

so were all wheel horses before 1969 put together by hand by cecil and elmer pond? like for example a 1956 rj35

Edited by The Freightliner Guy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
stevebo
7 hours ago, The Freightliner Guy said:

so were all wheel horses before 1969 put together by hand by cecil and elmer pond? like for example a 1956 rj35

All tractors prior to the 1958 RJ were hand built. In 58 they started and assembly line but still hand built if you will

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • bigbuck
      By bigbuck
      I'm not positive of the model, but I think I'm close. Please call George at 517-499-5678
    • RJcollector
      By RJcollector
      Ive been thinking about selling my 4 RJ-58s and all the attachments and parts I have. I have 4 tractors-2 have Kohler K91T , 1 has the Clinton and one has no engine. Only 1 is missing the serial number decal. Kohlers run. Clinton needs a carb. I have original exhaust shields AND belt guards for 3 of them. 3 mower decks, 2 plows, cart, 2 spare transmissions, parts breakdowns, original manuals and sale tags, seats, tires.  Not sure if I should sell it as 1 big collection or break it up. And also a good starting price?  I'll post pics when I get a chance. Thanks
    • Keaton
      By Keaton
      i do not know how to route this throttle cable on this RJ 59, i will attach some pictures, i watched packrats video on adjusting the govner on his 401, it did not look the same. also i think that and is way to long so that might be part of it. ( and also the color on that block looks beautifull) there is come pics, the more the better!







    • wh315-8
      By wh315-8
      The RJ58 was the big hit for spectators this year at my local festivals here in Carroll County OH. 
      the children loved getting their pictures sitting on it, then they discovered the bicycle horn under the steering wheel. It’s always a joy even in parades. Just love showing off part of my collection every year and hearing all the stories from those that had WH in their lives at one time. Can hardly wait to get to retirement so I can get some of my other models back to their glory in working order and be able to attend other shows/festivals throughout the year. My fellow tractor enthusiasts always know when a spectacular starts asking about WH, they point in my direction. I study up on the history of the different models and always intrigue those that didn’t know much about how WH came to be. This website is one place that has helped me learn so much about the WH history and I thank you for sharing your knowledge that I am able to pass on to keep WH alive and well.




    • CasualObserver
      By CasualObserver
      Operator manual
      Illustrated parts list
      6 pages 3.73MB
       
      Illustrated parts list #A-7136
      Includes PSB #023 #052 #058 #060 #080
      10 pages 938.48KB
       
      Engines used according to Toro
      Clinton B1290-1107
      Kohler K91-31307A
      Kohler K91-31388A
      Electric start kit
      Electric starter kit model EC-35 for Clinton engine - Listed for 1958 and 1959
      Electric starter kit model EK-35 for Kohler engine - Listed for 1958 and 1959
       
      6-12 tire chains model TC-12 - Listed for 1958 and 1959
       
      Seat cushion Foam rubber with imitation leather cover model FC-24 - Listed for 1958 and 1959
       
      Transmission drive belt 1567 - (4L x 29" or 1/2" x 29")
       
      Details & Attachments
      2 pages 107.33KB
       
      1958 model RJ-58
      1958 serial numbers that have shown up for the RJ-58
      Early models used Kohler K90T-27107D equipped with a Schnacke recoil unit with a backup rope starter contained under the recoil assembly and an oil bath air filter.
      00005
      00251
      01099 - No casting date on trans. Leather gearshift boot, large, round rear wheel hubs, "slab" hitch, replacement engine
      01188 - Has round rear wheel hubs
      01516
      01768
      01789 - No casting date on trans. Leather gearshift boot, 3-ear triangular rear wheel hubs, "slab" hitch, Clinton engine with Schnacke recoil
      01797
      01871
      02525
      03177
      03501 - Located in UK
      03796 - Kohler K90T-27107D with serial 364044 equipped with a Schnacke recoil unit with a backup rope starter contained under the recoil assembly and an oil bath air filter.
      04883
      04885
      05000
      05619
      05714
      05798
      06528 - May be 16528
      06749
      06771
      07633
      07649 - Transmission J12-8 October 12, 1958
      07725
      08440
      08612
      09284
      09337 - Hard to read
      10163
      11432
      11628 - # 3521 spline gear with 10 splines changed to 11 splines in 5003 and 5010 transmissions at serial # 11628 PSB #023
      11916
      12221 - B3-9 trans casting date - Kohler K91 engine with Schnacke recoil
      12291
      14473
      14713
      16097
      16528 - May be 06528
      166x6
      16868 - F4-9 trans casting date - Kohler K91 engine with Fairbanks recoil, solid pan seat without holes
      18348
      June 2023
      18500 and lower 
      Late 1958 units came with a Kohler K-91T-31307A equipped with a Schnacke recoil unit with a backup rope starter contained under the recoil assembly and an oil bath air filter.
      ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       
      Details & Attachments
      2 pages 106.94KB
       
      1959 model RJ-59
      1959 serial numbers that have shown up for the RJ-59
      Early 1959 units came with a Kohler K-91T-31307A equipped with a Schnacke recoil unit with a backup rope starter contained under the recoil assembly and an oil bath air filter.
      18501 and up - Possible 1100 units built
      20078 - Located in UK
      203xx
      21033
      292xx
      21900 - 1960 Suburban 400 began production at serial #21900 somewhere around Aug-Oct 1959.
      Late model RJ-59 tractors with a Kohler would have a K-91T-31388A with the Fairbanks recoil starter and paper air filter element. The 31388A was also used on the 1960 Suburban 400.
      K91T-31388A Serial 425251 found on RJ-59
×
×
  • Create New...