C.M.C-175 0 #1 Posted December 23, 2009 Are all C-Series engine mount plates the same except for the location of the bolt holes for the actual engine to mount on? I am repowering a C-175 with a Briggs and I will probably have to drill new holes to mount the Briggs engine to the plate, but was wondering if everything else is the same as far as the plate to frame mounting etc.? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rickv1957 72 #2 Posted December 23, 2009 I beleive all the mounts should be the same,Rick Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
baerpath 517 #3 Posted December 24, 2009 The Onan and Kohler plates are the same height, The ones for Briggs and tecumseh are riser ones that lift the engine about an inch. When we put the twin briggs on the C165 we just bought a plate from our local dealer. Just looked up one for a C161 with a briggs Might also might depend if your using an L head or a V twin ? Ours has a L Duane Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
C.M.C-175 0 #4 Posted December 24, 2009 Hey Thanks! I just looked up the engine cradle for a C-161 with a Briggs engine on Toro's parts website and apparently that part #106506 engine cradle is not available through the dealer anymore. I'll bet that is going to be a bear o find one of those used. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
baerpath 517 #5 Posted December 24, 2009 My mistake Look up A1-16B801 a GT 1600 Workhorse with a twin briggs. Thats the plate we used. If it's not avaliable it will give you a idea of the shape. I'm not sure what Gator used when he put the V twin in his 520. Maybe he'll jump in Duane Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
C.M.C-175 0 #6 Posted December 24, 2009 Just looked up the engine cradles for the Workhorse. Those engine cradles are still available, but it lists two different model numbers. The one is part # 110065 - Base Engine *R & the other is part # 109534 Base Engine. I am assuming that the Base Engine # is for the single cylinder Kohler and the Base Engine *R is for the Briggs twin. Would that be correct? There is quite a price difference between the two, I wonder what the difference is, unless its the height difference between the Kohler and the Briggs. :notworthy: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TT-(Moderator) 1,131 #7 Posted December 24, 2009 I used a 1982 GT-1142 engine riser/adapter plate under my Vanguard twin on the C-85 "experiment". Sacrificing the rubber-mounted engine is no big deal - especially since the V twin is quite smooth compared to an opposed twin. Craig - track Kelly down and see if he still has the mounting plate from the GT-1800/1848 he recently parted out. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tarcoleo 119 #8 Posted December 24, 2009 Looking at the photo of the GT-1142 engine riser/adapter plate above, it appears that the actual height of the engine mounting surface above the frame is no different than it is with the vibration-isolating base plates found in my C-111 and C-81 units. The GT-1142 unit appears to be rigid and does not isolate engine vibration. Maybe with greater power, restricting engine movement may be important. Tom in Little Compton, RI :notworthy: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wheelhorsec85 5 #9 Posted December 24, 2009 hi the engine plate that tt is showing is the one you need . i have one if you are interested just call me at 860-716-9428 jeff Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
baerpath 517 #10 Posted December 24, 2009 The newer twin engined one's all used solid mount. The GT twins 1600 and 1800 417/418/420- 500 series The C195 mounted straight to the frame and a peice of angle iron bolted to the side of it Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
C.M.C-175 0 #11 Posted December 28, 2009 Thanks everyone, you guys are awesome! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Daddy Don 905 #12 Posted December 30, 2009 They are the same. I went from a briggs to a kol on a c111. The mount is the same. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites