Bar Nuthin 899 #1 Posted March 28 I wasn't looking for a mower deck, but when someone offers up fairly solid rear discharge for $50 - you kinda have to take it - right? Model tag is shot, so I'll have to do some searching. Curios as to what bolts along the back edge. Looks like there's never been anything there, so I'm guessing whatever it is - is optional. Maybe a striper, or just a deflector? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
953 nut 57,472 #2 Posted March 28 Some people bolt or pop-rivet a piece of vinyl floor base board on there to keep the clippings from going all over. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ed Kennell 40,237 #3 Posted March 29 I've seen a short metal deflector bolted on there. I'm not sure if they are a factory/dealer option. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JCM 9,991 #4 Posted March 29 This one pictured was a deck that came with a 1986 312-8 that I restored both deck and tractor. This one as yours with nothing attached to the holes. This was an original owner tractor when I bought it. @Bar Nuthin 2 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MainelyWheelhorse 919 #5 Posted March 29 On 3/28/2025 at 11:05 PM, 953 nut said: Some people bolt or pop-rivet a piece of vinyl floor base board on there to keep the clippings from going all over. A thin strip of rubber bolted through the provided square holes works good too that’s what I used on mine. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Blasterdad 2,994 #6 Posted March 29 On 3/28/2025 at 11:02 PM, Bar Nuthin said: Curios as to what bolts along the back edge. Looks like there's never been anything there, so I'm guessing whatever it is - is optional. Maybe a striper, or just a deflector? I have that same deck 42" RD. Some were recyclers, a block off plate bolts there to help with mulching. I took it off mine. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
oliver2-44 10,239 #7 Posted March 29 I have a deck like that and it has a short deflector plate. Mine looks factory. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ed Kennell 40,237 #8 Posted March 29 Mower Rotary 42in RD 1976 65-42MR01 TIPL.pdf Factory deflector item 113. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Brockport Bill 1,817 #9 Posted March 29 i have rehabbed a number of the 42 rd decks -- i have found installing a piece of household baseboard vinyl ( has a natural curl ) with carriage bolts to be a simple and inexpensive way of deflecting the grass clippings downward -- especially important if you have a H tractor rather than a gear tranny so as to avoid the clippings going on to the Hydro fins. Good Luck, Bill 1 7 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
peter lena 9,053 #10 Posted March 29 @Brockport Bill very nice job on that , ! only different thing I did was remove the ROT BOXES under the deck , initially experimented with a very sad deck , also always cut at highest setting , for better discharge flow . actually deck function is a thorough detailing , and elimination of problem spots , once I made the change out , its a BASE LINE FOR REPEDITIVE AREAS . still marvel at the pto lever function to related belt mule drive , and all bearings , no whining noise or screaming clutch , it all looks original , but detailing its movement , was the deal for me , pete 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MainelyWheelhorse 919 #11 Posted March 29 (edited) On 3/28/2025 at 11:02 PM, Bar Nuthin said: I wasn't looking for a mower deck, but when someone offers up fairly solid rear discharge for $50 - you kinda have to take it - right? Model tag is shot, so I'll have to do some searching. Curios as to what bolts along the back edge. Looks like there's never been anything there, so I'm guessing whatever it is - is optional. Maybe a striper, or just a deflector? I’d say it’s somewhere in the 80’s as the ID tag looks like the one on my 42 RD deck which was I think an 89. The one on my 92 312’s mowing deck that was bought with it when new is completely different. Also, the ID tag for my 87 308 is similar to yours as well. Edited March 29 by MainelyWheelhorse 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bar Nuthin 899 #12 Posted March 29 On 3/29/2025 at 4:12 PM, MainelyWheelhorse said: I’d say it’s somewhere in the 80’s as the ID tag looks like the one on my 42 RD deck which was I think an 89. The one on my 92 312’s mowing deck that was bought with it when new is completely different. I agree. The grease zerk holes in the belt guards put it into the mid-'80s 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bar Nuthin 899 #13 Posted March 29 (edited) These baffles seem counter-intuitive to me. Plus they look like a built in rust trap. @Brockport Bill what is your opinion between the 2 decks you have? Edited March 29 by Bar Nuthin Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Brockport Bill 1,817 #14 Posted Sunday at 12:51 AM On 3/29/2025 at 4:28 PM, Bar Nuthin said: These baffles seem counter-intuitive to me. Plus they look like a built in rust trap. @Brockport Bill what is your opinion between the 2 decks you have? its difficult to know the design logic at WH company when they did the deck engineering? yes, i agree the baffles are just grass traps and therefore rust incubators ------ and worse they have designed openings which invite the grass into the cavities so i dont get the purpose -- Also, its hard to guess the design of those with the 2 sectioning baffles that go from front of the underneath to the rear dicharge area divided into thirds???? ------ other than it keeps the grass airflow segragated to its own blade section for the discharge -- of course then WH also made those with NO baffles or cowlings - - so hard to know the WH logic -- Frankly, I doubt it makes much difference how the grass is actually cut or discharged other than in the entirely open design there must be lots of cross turbulance from the three different blade areas 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bar Nuthin 899 #15 Posted Sunday at 05:10 AM On 3/30/2025 at 12:51 AM, Brockport Bill said: the baffles are just grass traps and therefore rust incubators I took a closer look today, and they are packed full of nasty. They're coming off!!! 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Brockport Bill 1,817 #16 Posted Sunday at 05:41 AM On 3/30/2025 at 5:10 AM, Bar Nuthin said: I took a closer look today, and they are packed full of nasty. They're coming off!!! are you doing a mower rehab? If yes, after pressure wash - consider sand blast to get off all that corrosion/rust? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bar Nuthin 899 #17 Posted Sunday at 03:35 PM On 3/30/2025 at 5:41 AM, Brockport Bill said: are you doing a mower rehab? If yes, after pressure wash - consider sand blast to get off all that corrosion/rust? Not a full rehab, but a functional one. I work for a chemical company and have solutions to neutralizing the rust. I also have a small sandblaster, if I decide to go that route. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
oliver2-44 10,239 #18 Posted Monday at 03:00 PM On 3/30/2025 at 3:35 PM, Bar Nuthin said: I work for a chemical company and have solutions to neutralizing the rust. Share with us, with safety appropriate safety procedures. Battling/Removing rust is one of the big time consumers on preserving these machines. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
8ntruck 7,326 #19 Posted Monday at 04:01 PM On 3/30/2025 at 12:51 AM, Brockport Bill said: its difficult to know the design logic at WH company when they did the deck engineering? yes, i agree the baffles are just grass traps and therefore rust incubators ------ and worse they have designed openings which invite the grass into the cavities so i dont get the purpose -- Also, its hard to guess the design of those with the 2 sectioning baffles that go from front of the underneath to the rear dicharge area divided into thirds???? ------ other than it keeps the grass airflow segragated to its own blade section for the discharge -- of course then WH also made those with NO baffles or cowlings - - so hard to know the WH logic -- Frankly, I doubt it makes much difference how the grass is actually cut or discharged other than in the entirely open design there must be lots of cross turbulance from the three different blade areas I don't know the time lines of the various baffle designs on these decks, but removing them seems like it might be a cost savings idea - especially if the cutting performance of the deck is minimally affected. My 42" RD deck still has the rust boxes, but no straight baffles towards the back, though there is evidence that it had them at one time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bar Nuthin 899 #20 Posted 22 hours ago On 3/31/2025 at 3:00 PM, oliver2-44 said: Share with us, with safety appropriate safety procedures. Battling/Removing rust is one of the big time consumers on preserving these machines. Unfortunately, we only deal with industrial manufacturers. Most of the rust removers aren't much more than various strength acids - some with thickeners or other wetting additives. Most required an extended soak time and are priced in the ridiculous zone. I'm fortunate in that I can keep leftover samples from various trials. The biggest thing with chemical rust removers is that they need some type of conversion coating immediately after rinsing to prevent flash rust. I also have leftover zirconium samples that provide corrosion resistance and paint adhesion. If I had to purchase something retail, I'd go with one of the many rust converter products out there like this one. https://a.co/d/dbLFm9s Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
OoPEZoO 549 #21 Posted 4 hours ago I will say that my 36" RD had the baffles when I originally got the tractor 20ish years ago. It always cut well. Eventually, they mostly rotted out and I cut out what was left. The deck does not cut nearly as nice as it did when it had the baffles in. I had planned to weld in new ones, then had a zero turn fall in my lap and I no longer use my horses to mow........BUT, I still want to get around to putting those baffles in, because I know my horses will last longer than the zero turn 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bar Nuthin 899 #22 Posted 3 hours ago (edited) 4 hours ago, OoPEZoO said: I will say that my 36" RD had the baffles when I originally got the tractor 20ish years ago. It always cut well. Eventually, they mostly rotted out and I cut out what was left. The deck does not cut nearly as nice as it did when it had the baffles in. I had planned to weld in new ones, then had a zero turn fall in my lap and I no longer use my horses to mow........BUT, I still want to get around to putting those baffles in, because I know my horses will last longer than the zero turn I have a nice zero-turn for mowing, but like adding functionality to my WH. Since the baffles are mostly intact, I'll probably patch them up for now to see how it does. If I like them, maybe some modifications to avoid trapping crud inside the baffle plates. I'm thinking they would benefit the mulching effect of the deck - which would be a good reason for using it. My zero-turn cuts great, but does very little for chopping up leaves that accumulate around certain areas of my property. When I use my WH side discharge it's about a 50% improvement - so my hope is to improve on that. My thought is that with the factory baffles and the addition of a rear flap might accomplish my goal. Edited 3 hours ago by Bar Nuthin Share this post Link to post Share on other sites