Could be a RJ-59?

[HorseWhisperer 243]

I looked at a 58 today and it had K7-0 in front of the shifter and nothing behind it(under seat)I have a 58 with two sqaure notches and the one I looked at today only had one on the sector.

[VinsRJ 721]

I looked at a 58 today and it had K7-0 in front of the shifter and nothing behind it(under seat)I have a 58 with two sqaure notches and the one I looked at today only had one on the sector.

Without a serial tag there is no way to truely know. It is well documented that WH was using "RJ-58" serial tags well into the 59 model year. Like most the one you looked at was a RJ-58 manufactured in 1959, most likely lat 1959.

[HorseWhisperer 243]

THANKS so much!

[buckrancher 2,679]

I looked at a 58 today and it had K7-0 in front of the shifter and nothing behind it(under seat)I have a 58 with two sqaure notches and the one I looked at today only had one on the sector.

could also be a replacement transmission

[HorseWhisperer 243]

So easy to look past the obvious Brian!I have thrown good money after bad before!That would be the simplest reason!